4.
Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment GPA20-0001/ Rezone
Z20-0005/ Specific Plan SP20-0001/ Tentative Subdivision Map
TM20-0002/
Creekside Village Specific Plan- Reduced Impact Alternative request the
following entitlements:
1. Amendment of the County of El Dorado General Plan to change the
project site from Research & Development (R&D) to Adopted Plan (AP);
2. Rezone of the project site from R&D to Creekside Village Specific
Plan (CV-SP);
3. Adoption of the Creekside Village Specific Plan - Reduced Impact
Alternative (CVSP-RIA) for development of approximately 208 acres of
land with a mix of residential (maximum 763 dwelling units), parks,
optional neighborhood commercial, and open space land uses; and
4. Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map for individual single-family
lots within the CVSP-RIA.
The property, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 117-010-032 and
a portion of 117-720-012, consisting of 208 acres, is located
approximately 3 miles south of U.S. Highway 50 (US 50) on the west side
of Latrobe Road, in the unincorporated community of El Dorado Hills,
submitted by Winn Communities/ George Carpenter;
Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation
to the Board of Supervisors to take the following actions:
1. Certify the Creekside Village Specific Plan (CVSP) Final
Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020110052) and adopt the CEQA
Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and
2. Adopt the General Plan Amendment (GPA20-0001), and approve the
Rezone (Z20-0005), Creekside Village Specific Plan - Reduced Impact
Alternative (SP20-0001), and Tentative Subdivision Map for the Reduced
Impact Alternative (TM20-0002), subject to the Findings and Conditions of
Approval as presented herein.
(Supervisorial District 2)
Public Comment: R. Daly; S. Taylor; G. Mathis; T. Chatfield; G. J.; K. Payne; L.
Campbell; J. Harn
Chair Williams opened the hearing. Commissioner Frega disclosed that they
met with the applicant and visited the site; Chair Williams disclosed a
longstanding interest in prior versions of the project and noted previous
opposition. They clarified that they have not participated in the matter since
joining the Planning Commission.
Upon hearing from staff and the public, Chair Williams closed the hearing.
A motion was made by Commissioner Spaur, seconded by Chair Williams, to
recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny the entitlements in favor of a
more comprehensive plan better aligned with the existing general plan and
zoning.
3 - Commissioner Spaur, Commissioner Williams and Costello
2 - Commissioner Frega and Commissioner Hansen
Yes:
Noes: