Hearing to consider General Plan Amendment GPA20-0001/ Rezone
Z20-0005/ Specific Plan SP20-0001/ Tentative Subdivision Map
TM20-0002/
4.
Creekside Village Specific Plan- Reduced Impact Alternative request
the following entitlements:
1. Amendment of the County of El Dorado General Plan to change
the project site from Research & Development (R&D) to Adopted Plan
(AP);
2. Rezone of the project site from R&D to Creekside Village Specific
Plan (CV-SP);
3. Adoption of the Creekside Village Specific Plan - Reduced Impact
Alternative (CVSP-RIA) for development of approximately 208 acres of
land with a mix of residential (maximum 763 dwelling units), parks,
optional neighborhood commercial, and open space land uses; and
4. Approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map for individual single-family
lots within the CVSP-RIA.
The property, identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 117-010-032
and a portion of 117-720-012, consisting of 208 acres, is located
approximately 3 miles south of U.S. Highway 50 (US 50) on the west
side of Latrobe Road, in the unincorporated community of El Dorado
Hills, submitted by Winn Communities/ George Carpenter;
Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a
recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to take the following
actions:
1. Certify the Creekside Village Specific Plan (CVSP) Final
Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020110052) and adopt the
CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and
2. Adopt the General Plan Amendment (GPA20-0001), and approve
the Rezone (Z20-0005), Creekside Village Specific Plan - Reduced
Impact Alternative (SP20-0001), and Tentative Subdivision Map for the
Reduced Impact Alternative (TM20-0002), subject to the Findings and
Conditions of Approval as presented herein.
(Supervisorial District 2)
Public Comment: R. Daly; S. Taylor; G. Mathis; T. Chatfield; G. J.; K. Payne; L.
Campbell; J. Harn
Chair Williams opened the hearing. Commissioner Frega disclosed that they
met with the applicant and visited the site; Chair Williams disclosed a
longstanding interest in prior versions of the project and noted previous
opposition. They clarified that they have not participated in the matter since
joining the Planning Commission.
Upon hearing from staff and the public, Chair Williams closed the hearing.
A motion was made by Commissioner Spaur, seconded by Chair Williams, to
recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny the entitlements in favor of a
more comprehensive plan better aligned with the existing general plan and
zoning.
3 - Commissioner Spaur, Commissioner Williams and Costello
2 - Commissioner Frega and Commissioner Hansen
Yes:
Noes: