Title
Chief Administrative Office recommending the Board order the Auditor-Controller to disburse $1,750,000 to the El Dorado Hills Community Service District from its Development Impact Mitigation Fee account for attorney fees.
FUNDING: Development Impact Fees.
Body
DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND
The California Mitigation Fee Act (Cal. Gov. §66000 et seq.) provides for the establishment of fees to mitigate the impacts of new development on public facilities in order to maintain the established level of service. Individual Special Districts do not have the authority to establish these fees; as a result, the County establishes fees on behalf of the districts. In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, these revenues are segregated and deposited into a separate account for each district.
The subject request is to reimburse the District for settlement and attorney's fees paid to resolve the matter of Thomas and Helen Austin v. County of El Dorado, El Dorado Hills Community Service District, et al. (El Dorado County Superior Court Case No. PC20150633). A copy of the settlement agreement is included with the District's request and outlined below (Attachment A). The amount paid by the District that is the subject of the current reimbursement request is a proper expense of its Development Impact Mitigation Fee Account due to the "common fund doctrine," pursuant to which a party (in this case, the Austins) who preserves or recovers a fund for the benefit of others in addition to himself may recover his attorney's fees and costs from the fund itself.
Attorney Fees - $1,750,000
The County last revised the development impact fees on behalf of the District on June 17, 2025 (Legistar file 25-0899) via Resolution 083-2025.
The County has entered into an agreement with the District, whereby the District agrees to "hold County harmless and defend County and its employees, officers, and agents from any claim, liability, or action" resulting from the County’s calculation, im...
Click here for full text