File #: 14-0832    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 6/10/2014 In control: Community Corrections Partnership
On agenda: 6/25/2014 Final action: 6/25/2014
Title: CCP staff recommending the Executive Committee review the ‘Unmet Needs’ list as outlined in the FPAC Report and direct the Fiscal Subcommittee to develop funding recommendations to the CCP.
Attachments: 1. A - DA Victim Witness Advocate Proposal
Title
CCP staff recommending the Executive Committee review the 'Unmet Needs' list as outlined in the FPAC Report and direct the Fiscal Subcommittee to develop funding recommendations to the CCP.
 
Body
 
Background
The FPAC had a number of discussions regarding the list of items developed by a working group in 2013 and their continued relevance.  As those items were discussed and some discarded, new items were brought forward by attendees. The resulting revised list was dubbed the 'Unmet Needs' list. The Unmet Needs list is detailed below.
List of Unmet Needs Identified by the FPAC (Further explained in FPAC Report submitted under Agenda Item #14-0817)
1.   Sheriff:  SB1022 seed money ($600,000)
2.   Sheriff: Inmate Deductible ($75,000)
3.   Sheriff or Probation: CCC Lunches ($16,500)
4.   Sheriff: 20% Catastrophic Insurance ($18,000)
5.   HHSA: SLT- CCC Model (lease cost) ($20,000)
6.   HHSA - Psychiatry ($83,000)
7.   Probation: DPO ($90,000)
8.   Probation: CCC Vehicle ($34,000)
9.   District Attorney-Advocate ($66,583) - Proposal with details is included as Attachment A.
10. City Police Patrols ($149,000)      
11  City Police Crisis Intervention Team Training ($12,000)
10. 5% Budget Reserve ($190,000)
 
 
Reason for Recommendation
As stated in the FPAC Report; the CCP Executive Committee will need to determine what, if any, items should be funded off of this list, understanding that funding any items above will require additional fund balance draw down, and that the total amount of estimated Unmet Needs costs  exceeds available fund balance, and that at the end of FY 15/16 it is conceivable that fund balance could be completely depleted under current spending obligations. Developing a strategic plan that outlines goals and objectives of public safety realignment programming and services first would provide a more robust framework for determining what, if anything, should be added to the already limited AB 109 budget.