File #: 15-0890    Version:
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 7/14/2015 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 2/23/2016 Final action: 2/23/2016
Title: Auditor-Controller recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 207-2015 to approve Interpretation of the Rate, Method of Apportionment, and Manner of Collection of Special Tax for Community Facilities District 2005-1 (Blackstone). (Cont. 1/12/16, Item 2)
Attachments: 1. A - Reso to Interpret Blkstn RMA 12-15-15, 2. B - Reso to Interpret Bkstn RMA JHarn Ltr 11-25-15 12-15-15, 3. C - Reso to Interpret Blkstn RMA Blue Route 12-15-15, 4. Executed Resolution 207-2015
Title
Auditor-Controller recommending the Board adopt and authorize the Chair to sign Resolution 207-2015 to approve Interpretation of the Rate, Method of Apportionment, and Manner of Collection of Special Tax for Community Facilities District 2005-1 (Blackstone). (Cont. 1/12/16, Item 2)
Body
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with the Valley View Specific Plan Development Agreement adopted by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors on December 8, 1998 the County is required to assist the Developer in obtaining community facilities district (CFD) financing for infrastructure needed for the Blackstone subdivision.

On March 8, 2005 the Board adopted Resolution 056-2005, pursuant to a land owner election, approving a Rate, Method of Apportionment, and Manner of Collection of Special Tax (RMA). Within this RMA there is a provision that allows your Board, by way of Resolution, to clarify any vagueness or ambiguity as it relates to the Special Tax Rate, the method of apportionment, the classification of properties, or any definitions applicable to the CFD. The land use designations for Villages V, W, and X originally included commercial property. The County recently changed the land use designations to accommodate only single family residential uses. Without your Board’s adoption of this resolution, certain single family homes in Villages V, W, and X will pay no special taxes. This is unfair and will reduce the security for the bonds.

DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND
N/A

ALTERNATIVES
N/A

OTHER DEPARTMENT / AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
N/A

CAO RECOMMENDATION
CAO concurs with the department recommendation.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
This item is unlikely to have any impact on the County General Fund. The only foreseeable circumstance that would make the County partially responsible for debt service payments or damages to bond investors would be if an error or omission is made by the County in the formation of the district, in the preparation of the offering statement, in th...

Click here for full text