Legislation Details

File #: 26-0960    Version:
Type: Agenda Item Status: Time Allocation
File created: 5/26/2026 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 9/22/2026 Final action:
Title: HEARING - To consider three separate appeals (TM-A26-0001, TM-A26-0002, TM-A26-0003) received from 1) Dean Getz, 2) Gary Kinghorn, and 3) Tara McCann appealing the Planning Commission’s May 14, 2026 approval of Tentative Subdivision Map/Planned Development Permit TM25-0003/PD25-0005/Serrano Village M5 subdivision of an existing 8.42-acre lot into 10 residential lots in the El Dorado Hills area. (District 1) Staff recommending the Board take the following action: 1) Uphold the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Subdivision Map/Planned Development Permit TM25-0003/PD25-0005/Serrano Village M5 (deny appeals TM-A26-0001, TM-A26-0002, and TM-A26-0003), based on the Findings of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission (Attachment F), as may be modified by the Board, incorporating the Department of Transportation's Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2D) based on the subsequent analysis directed by the Board; and 2) Uphold the Planning Commission finding that the project...
Attachments: 1. 2A - Continued Appeals Memo, 2. 2B - DOT Supplemental M5 Traffic Analysis Memo, 3. 2C - Serrano Village Dwelling Units Comparison Table, 4. 2D - Revised Conditions of Approval, 5. 2E - EDHCSD Response Letter to EDC with Attachments, 6. A - Appeal Packet - TM-A26-0001, 7. B - Appeal Packet - TM-A26-0002, 8. C - Appeal Packet - TM-A26-0003, 9. D - Staff Memo, 10. E - PC Staff Report, 11. F - PC Findings, 12. G - PC Conditions of Approval, 13. H1 - PC Staff Report Exhibits A-E, 14. H2 - PC Staff Report Exhibits F-L, 15. H3 - PC Staff Report Exhibits M-N, 16. H4 - PC Staff Report Exhibits O-S, 17. I - Serrano Village M5 Access and Local Circulation Analysis, 18. J - Staff Presentation, 19. Public Comment BOS RCVD 6-11-2026, 20. Public Comment BOS RCVD 6-12-2026, 21. Appellant Getz Response, 22. Getz's Facts and Chronology, 23. Appellant Mccann Response, 24. Public Comment BOS RCVD 6-15-2026, 25. Public Comment BOS RCVD 6-16-2026, 26. Public Comment Rcvd 6-16-2026 BOS 6-16-2026, 27. Appellant Getz submission at hearing, 28. Appellant Mccann submission at hearing
Related files: 19-1085, 19-1171, 19-1714, 21-0695, 25-0387, 26-0785, 25-1214
Title
HEARING - To consider three separate appeals (TM-A26-0001, TM-A26-0002, TM-A26-0003) received from 1) Dean Getz, 2) Gary Kinghorn, and 3) Tara McCann appealing the Planning Commission’s May 14, 2026 approval of Tentative Subdivision Map/Planned Development Permit TM25-0003/PD25-0005/Serrano Village M5 subdivision of an existing 8.42-acre lot into 10 residential lots in the El Dorado Hills area. (District 1)

Staff recommending the Board take the following action:
1) Uphold the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Subdivision Map/Planned Development Permit TM25-0003/PD25-0005/Serrano Village M5 (deny appeals TM-A26-0001, TM-A26-0002, and TM-A26-0003), based on the Findings of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission (Attachment F), as may be modified by the Board, incorporating the Department of Transportation's Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2D) based on the subsequent analysis directed by the Board; and
2) Uphold the Planning Commission finding that the project is Statutorily Exempt pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Continued Item 41, June 16, 2026)

FUNDING: Privately funded appeals for applicant-funded project.
Body

DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND
On May 14, 2026 (Legistar file 26-0785), the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a request for Serrano Village M5 subdivision on property identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number 123-020-023 (8.42 acres), in the El Dorado Hills area. The Planning Commission approved TM25-0003/PD25-0005 with a vote of four (4) ayes and one (1) no.

Following the Planning Commission’s action, three (3) appeal applications were timely submitted, appealing the approved project to the Board of Supervisors. A hearing on the appeals was scheduled for June 16, 2026. Staff provided its analysis and conclusions in the original Staff Memo (Attachment D).

On June 16, 2026 (Legistar File 26-0960, Version 1), the Board considered the appeals and received public testimony. The Board vote...

Click here for full text