File #: 06-1762    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 11/1/2006 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 11/14/2006 Final action: 11/14/2006
Title: Hearing to consider approval of the following for Le Caille Estates on 36.51 acres (APN 070-072-44) in the Shingle Springs area , requested by Danny L. Dorkin: (1) Ordinance 4708 to rezone (Z05-0004) property from Estate Residential Ten-acre (RE-10) to One-acre Residential (R1A); (2) Tentative Subdivision Map (TM05-1395) proposing to create 24 lots ranging in size from 1.0 to 2.2 acres in size; (3) Project annexation into the El Dorado Irrigation District service area; and (4) Design waiver to construct a four-foot wide sidewalk in lieu of the six-foot wide sidewalk required under Standard Plan 101B.
Attachments: 1. Z05-0004 TM05-1395 Findings.pdf, 2. Z05-0004 TM05-1395 MM Conditions.pdf, 3. Z05-0004 TM05-1395 Attachment 3.pdf, 4. Z05-0004 TM05-1395 Staff Report.pdf, 5. Z05-0004 IS Responses.pdf
Related files: 18-0438, 18-1948
Title
Hearing to consider approval of the following for Le Caille Estates on 36.51 acres (APN 070-072-44) in the Shingle Springs area , requested  by  Danny L. Dorkin:
 
(1)   Ordinance 4708 to rezone (Z05-0004) property from Estate Residential Ten-acre (RE-10) to One-acre Residential (R1A);
(2)  Tentative Subdivision Map (TM05-1395) proposing to create 24 lots ranging in size from 1.0 to 2.2 acres in size;
(3)  Project annexation into the El Dorado Irrigation District service area; and
(4)  Design waiver to construct a four-foot wide sidewalk in lieu of the six-foot wide sidewalk required under Standard Plan 101B.   
 
Body
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the Board take the following action:  1.  Adopt the mitigated negative declaration, as prepared; 2. Approve Z05-0004 rezoning Assessor's Parcel Number 070-072-44 from Estate Residential Ten-acre (RE-10) to One-acre Residential (R1A), based on the findings listed on Attachment 1; and 3. Approve TM05-1395, based on the findings listed on Attachment 1, subject to the conditions listed on Attachment 2.
 
Background: This project was considered by the Planning Commission on October 12, 2006, and unanimously recommended for approval by those Commissioners present (Commissioner Chaloupka was absent). There were no new significant issues discussed other than those in the staff report.
 
Contact: Gregory L. Fuz (5445)/Jason Hade (5874)