Title
Supervisor Nutting requesting the Board reconsider its' March 24, 2009 approval of the operating cost for each Supervisorial District budget in the amount of $201,000 (Agenda File 09-0152); and requesting the Board schedule this item to be heard again with new information presented.
Body
On March 24, 2009, the Board of Supervisors voted, 4-1, to approve a per-District budget of $201,000.
This concept was initially presented by Supervisor Sweeney in a February 3, 2009 memo to the Board of Supervisors citing his concern for the differences in costs and expenses between the District offices and particularly pointing out the salaries and benefits of two Supervisor’s Assistants.
In a subsequent memo of February 27, 2009, Supervisor Sweeney recommended a target of $194,000 for the 08-09 and 09-10 fiscal years with an additional travel expense allocation added to the Tahoe district of $2,400.
The inadvertent and unexpected result of establishing a $201,000 per district budget effectively penalized the Tahoe district and financially rewarded the four other Supervisorial Districts. This was not what I believe the board intended to achieve.
The Board of Supervisors heard a budget presentation by the Clerk of the Board on March 24, 2009. The Clerk and the CAO concurred, stating that the Board had already made the appropriate cuts to their budget, $100,000, a 9.4% reduction. It was the Board’s desire to also cut travel and expenses, with additional cuts made at the last minute to comply with Supervisor Sweeney’s uniform district budget proposal and motion.
While the concept to implement uniform district expenditures is not an unreasonable concept, the result of the Board action was to restrict access and outreach for the District V office and their Lake Tahoe constituents, forcing a 30-day (unpaid) furlough upon the Supervisor’s Assistant, and allocating over $36,000 to the four other Supervisorial districts.
This action did not have the intended cost-cutti...
Click here for full text