File #: 21-1182    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Approved
File created: 7/12/2021 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 8/10/2021 Final action: 8/10/2021
Title: HEARING - Planning and Building Department, Planning Division, forwarding the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the Heritage at Carson Creek Project (Specific Plan Amendment SP-R20-0001/Tentative Subdivision Map TM20-0001/Development Agreement DA20-0001). The project site is located at APNs 117-680-003, 117-680-004, 117-680-007, 117-680-008, 117-680-016, 117-570-013, 117-570-017, and 117-570-018, consisting of 132.1 acres, in the El Dorado Hills area. (Supervisorial District 2) FUNDING: Developer Funded.
Attachments: 1. A - Approved Blue Route (Ordinance for SPA Adoption), 2. B - Approved Blue Route (Ordinance for DA Adoption), 3. C - Ordinance for SPA Adoption (Heritage at Carson Creek), 4. D - Ordinance for DA Adoption, 5. E - Staff Memo 07-08-21, 6. F - Planning Commission 06-10-21 Minute Order, 7. G - Staff Report (PC 06-10-21), 8. H - Findings (PC 06-10-21), 9. I - Conditions of Approval (PC 06-10-21), 10. J - Staff Report Exhibits A-J (PC 06-10-21), 11. K - Staff Report Exhibits K-T (PC 06-10-21), 12. L - Staff Report Exhibits U-V (PC 06-10-21), 13. M - Staff Report Exhibit W (Addendum to the CCSP EIR) (PC 06-10-21), 14. N - Carson Creek Development Agreement - Proposed Draft (6.4.21) (PC 06-10-21), 15. O - Memo from County Counsel re Development Agreement (CCSP) 6.4.21 (PC 06-10-21), 16. P - Notification Map (1 Mile), 17. Q - Proof of Publication-Mt. Democrat, 18. R - Proof of Publication-Sacramento Bee, 19. S - Staff Memo 07-27-21, 20. T - Staff Presentation, 21. U - Applicant Presentation, 22. V - REVISED Carson Creek Development Agreement - Proposed Draft (8.6.21), 23. Public Comment BOS Rcvd 8-10-21, 24. Public Comment Rcvd 8-9-2021, 25. Public Comment Rcvd 8-6-2021, 26. Public Comment Rcvd 8-4-2021, 27. Public Comment BOS Rcvd 7-19-21, 28. Public Comment Rcvd 07-16-21, 29. Public Comment Rcvd 07-15-21, 30. Executed Ordinance 5147, 31. Executed Ordinance 5148, 32. Executed Development Agreement, 33. RECEIPT-Notice of Determination, 34. FILED-Notice of Determination, 35. FINAL Findings, 36. FINAL Conditions of Approval
Related files: 21-0916, 19-1610
Title
HEARING - Planning and Building Department, Planning Division, forwarding the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the Heritage at Carson Creek Project (Specific Plan Amendment SP-R20-0001/Tentative Subdivision Map TM20-0001/Development Agreement DA20-0001). The project site is located at APNs 117-680-003, 117-680-004, 117-680-007, 117-680-008, 117-680-016, 117-570-013, 117-570-017, and 117-570-018, consisting of 132.1 acres, in the El Dorado Hills area. (Supervisorial District 2)

FUNDING: Developer Funded.
Body
DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND
Request to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the Heritage at Carson Creek Project (Specific Plan Amendment SP-R20-0001/Tentative Subdivision Map TM20-0001/Development Agreement DA20-0001) in the El Dorado Hills area, submitted by Lennar Homes of California. At its June 10, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisors deny the project. Following deliberation, Commissioner Ross made a motion, with a second from Commissioner Williams, to recommend denial of the project to the Board of Supervisors, noting reasons for denial as follows: 1) Incompatible zoning uses (Residential lots adjacent to Industrial lots/ buffers); 2) Concerns about the types of housing developments that our County should be promoting (work force housing); 3) Concerns about a connection road to Sacramento County area (Empire Ranch); and 4) Subdivision driveway lengths of only 18 feet (setbacks). The motion passed 3-2. Staff's analysis relative to the Planning Commission’s reasons for recommending denial are summarized in a separate staff memorandum included as an Attachment to this Legistar item. The Legistar number for the June 10, 2021 Planning Commission hearing is 21-0916.

ALTERNATIVES
1) The Board may elect to Approve the project based on staff analyses in the staff memorandum;
2) Remand the project to the Planning Commission for consideration of the information in the...

Click here for full text