File #: 24-1146    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Consent Calendar
File created: 6/14/2024 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 7/16/2024 Final action:
Title: County Counsel recommending the Board consider the following for legal services pertaining to the Sheetz litigation: 1) Make findings in accordance with Section 3.13.030 (C) of the County Ordinance that Due to the temporary or occasional nature of the work, the ongoing aggregate of work to be performed is not sufficient to warrant addition of permanent staff; and 2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign Amendment III to Agreement 990 (552-S1711) with Abbott & Kindermann, Inc., for Legal Services with a new amount not to exceed $300,000, increasing by $75,000. FUNDING: Risk Fund.
Attachments: 1. A- Approved CRS Amd 3, 2. B- Agreement Amd 3 552-S1711, 3. C- Agreement Amd 2 552-S1711, 4. D- Agreement Amd 1 552-S1711, 5. E- Agreement 552-S1711
Related files: 20-1287, 17-0721, 18-1049
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title
County Counsel recommending the Board consider the following for legal services pertaining to the Sheetz litigation:
1) Make findings in accordance with Section 3.13.030 (C) of the County Ordinance that Due to the temporary or occasional nature of the work, the ongoing aggregate of work to be performed is not sufficient to warrant addition of permanent staff; and
2) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign Amendment III to Agreement 990 (552-S1711) with Abbott & Kindermann, Inc., for Legal Services with a new amount not to exceed $300,000, increasing by $75,000.

FUNDING: Risk Fund.
Body

DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND
The County currently has an agreement for legal services with Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. to provide legal services to the County in the action entitled George Sheetz & Friends of El Dorado County v. County of El Dorado, El Dorado Superior Court Case No. PC20170255. The existing agreement has a total amount not to exceed $225,000 and is currently being run through Risk Management. There is the potential for the Risk Management reserves to be reimbursed for legal costs from the Mitigation Fee funds that are the subject of the litigation. Since the actual cost of the litigation is unknown and because of fees incurred to date, the not-to-exceed amount on the contract needs to be increased so that the representation and defense of the County can continue.

This litigation was originally filed on June 5, 2017. During the past seven years, the case went from the El Dorado County Superior Court (Superior Court) to the Third District Court of Appeal (3rd DCA) to the California Supreme Court (CA SC) (petition for review denied) to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and now, it has been remanded back to the 3rd DCA for further proceedings in accordance with the decision of SCOTUS. Due to the nature and complexity of the issues involved, it is difficult to predict the ultimate cost of the litigation. All the legal questions that will be addressed ...

Click here for full text